Shorter Reads

Family Court Statistics – A True Reflection?

Consultant, Charmaine Hast, examines different trends within family law, such as the number of divorce cases, the uses of pre- and post-nuptial agreements, the development of arbitration, and more.

3 minute read

Published 16 April 2025

Authors

Share

Key information

The author examines different trends within family law, such as the number of divorce cases, the uses of pre- and post-nuptial agreements, the development of arbitration, and more.

The data gathered by family courts is important reference material for private client lawyers handling clients’ family issues, which often feature in these pages given the implications for wealth. How well, or not, do the statistics capture what is happening in family law, and, if there are problems, what can be done? 

Interestingly, when statistics are published which, among other things, reflect an increase by 2 per cent in domestic violence applications and the number of orders made decreased by less than 1 per cent, various questions arise. When divorce cases drop by 1 per cent and continue to fall from the peak seen in 2022 further questions arise. However, the same statistics show that from October to December 2024 there were increases in financial remedy and domestic violence applications.

What the public may not be aware of is that in the court system financial applications would have taken 45 weeks for proceedings to be completed; there are, of course, quicker and less expensive alternatives. As an arbitrator (CIArb), I have experienced financial applications which, with sensible directions, result in a binding judgment by an arbitrator, even in complex matters, within about half the time.

It is not unknown for a final settlement to be reached in 30 weeks. The additional cost of an arbitrator is easily justified in less time being spent on the two sets of solicitors who are bound to comply with an exacting timetable. The ADR process where parties proceed to a private Financial Dispute Resolution has also seen a huge percentage of matters settled, outside the public eye.

Over the years, the family law arena has weathered the decrease in heterosexual divorces, the addition of same sex divorces, peppered with the requirement for pre- and post-nuptial agreements and even cohabitation agreements. These were not the order of the day prior to the case of Granatino v Radmacher in 2010.

The public has always operated under the misapprehension that there are “common law marriages” – there are not – and that pre- and post-nuptial agreements are not binding. Pre- and post-nuptial agreements carry weight with our courts if they are properly executed and, most importantly, “fair.” Unlike [the time] when mediation raised its head in the family law arena, and many dipped their toe into the mediation pool – aiming to try to please both parties, which in many cases was being guided by a non-family lawyer – pre-nuptial agreements are another beast altogether.

The latest statistics show a decrease in marriages and therefore a decrease in divorces and perhaps, if more people knew about the weight of pre-nuptial agreements, this statistic would be different from that which has recently been published.

There are rightly many family lawyers who do not undertake drafting pre- and post-nuptial agreements because the word “fair” is a hurdle. The certificate which solicitors and barristers attach to pre-nuptial agreements as evidence that each party has received independent legal advice, obviously does not reflect the advice given. However, the advice which must be given is whether in the view of the legal practitioner, the pre- or post-nuptial agreement will carry weight.

Regrettably, this is where one separates the men from the boys. There are many family practitioners who are excellent at the fact-finding mission of ascertaining assets and sourcing the correct value of those assets. Many practitioners however do not have the inclination to then commit to what is “fair.”

Many would say that in England and Wales where the present government is seemingly introducing fiscal obligations, including a burden on private pensions, marriage is one option which provides mitigation for families. The reluctance to marry, which would change the curve of the present statistics, would no doubt dissipate if the public knew that pre-nuptial agreements are worth the time, effort and money required to put a valid contract in place.

Understandably there are many who will not embark upon the task of drafting these documents and, more importantly, how often are pre- and post-nuptial agreements reviewed. There is no doubt that many agreements which will now, despite the increase in the attractiveness of these contracts in the last 15 years, carry no weight whatsoever. One also wonders whether this will open the flood gates to pre- and post-nuptial agreements being used not only by the rich and famous, but by the man or woman in the street. The costs of these documents are not unsubstantial but with the effluxion of time, these contracts should provide protection for a family’s ever-increasing asset position as they go through life, with a natural inclination for “more.”

I can recall many years ago being interviewed on national TV and debating with the editor of a national newspaper, why the man or woman in the street, who is not “rich and famous” should seriously consider this course of action for financial protection. This, in my view, is one way of taking a possible spoke out of the wheel by trying to give more longevity to marriages which deserve not to have “money” as the problem.

In conclusion, perhaps the question must be asked as to whether the Chancellor’s disliked tax provisions are in fact promoting marriage even for the anti-marriage brigade.

About the author
Charmaine Hast is a highly-regarded name in family law with experience and expertise in advising on complex, high-value and high-profile family matters, often with a cross-border element. She has represented a significant number of public figures including pop stars, actors and actresses, members of parliament, well known sportspeople, TV personalities, and entrepreneurs.

She is a member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and, as one of only a small number of Family Solicitor finance Arbitrators (CIArb), can hand down binding judgments in family law financial matters. Hast has a degree in psychology as well as law and is highly skilled at negotiating extremely favourable settlements and securing exceptional judgments for clients. She is also a qualified South African Attorney and has several reported cases, including The Supreme Court.

Among other accomplishments, Hast established the Family department at Wedlake Bell in 2011 and previously established and headed the Family team of South-East firm, TWM Solicitors. She is a member of Resolution (formerly Solicitors Family Law Association) where she was one of the first accredited specialists in high net worth financial matters and child abductions.

This article was originally published in Wealth Briefing Magazine in April 2025. You can read it here. 

Related latest updates
PREV NEXT

Related content

Arrow Back to Insights

Shorter Reads

Family Court Statistics – A True Reflection?

Consultant, Charmaine Hast, examines different trends within family law, such as the number of divorce cases, the uses of pre- and post-nuptial agreements, the development of arbitration, and more.

Published 16 April 2025

Associated sectors / services

  • Family and divorce

Authors

The author examines different trends within family law, such as the number of divorce cases, the uses of pre- and post-nuptial agreements, the development of arbitration, and more.

The data gathered by family courts is important reference material for private client lawyers handling clients’ family issues, which often feature in these pages given the implications for wealth. How well, or not, do the statistics capture what is happening in family law, and, if there are problems, what can be done? 

Interestingly, when statistics are published which, among other things, reflect an increase by 2 per cent in domestic violence applications and the number of orders made decreased by less than 1 per cent, various questions arise. When divorce cases drop by 1 per cent and continue to fall from the peak seen in 2022 further questions arise. However, the same statistics show that from October to December 2024 there were increases in financial remedy and domestic violence applications.

What the public may not be aware of is that in the court system financial applications would have taken 45 weeks for proceedings to be completed; there are, of course, quicker and less expensive alternatives. As an arbitrator (CIArb), I have experienced financial applications which, with sensible directions, result in a binding judgment by an arbitrator, even in complex matters, within about half the time.

It is not unknown for a final settlement to be reached in 30 weeks. The additional cost of an arbitrator is easily justified in less time being spent on the two sets of solicitors who are bound to comply with an exacting timetable. The ADR process where parties proceed to a private Financial Dispute Resolution has also seen a huge percentage of matters settled, outside the public eye.

Over the years, the family law arena has weathered the decrease in heterosexual divorces, the addition of same sex divorces, peppered with the requirement for pre- and post-nuptial agreements and even cohabitation agreements. These were not the order of the day prior to the case of Granatino v Radmacher in 2010.

The public has always operated under the misapprehension that there are “common law marriages” – there are not – and that pre- and post-nuptial agreements are not binding. Pre- and post-nuptial agreements carry weight with our courts if they are properly executed and, most importantly, “fair.” Unlike [the time] when mediation raised its head in the family law arena, and many dipped their toe into the mediation pool – aiming to try to please both parties, which in many cases was being guided by a non-family lawyer – pre-nuptial agreements are another beast altogether.

The latest statistics show a decrease in marriages and therefore a decrease in divorces and perhaps, if more people knew about the weight of pre-nuptial agreements, this statistic would be different from that which has recently been published.

There are rightly many family lawyers who do not undertake drafting pre- and post-nuptial agreements because the word “fair” is a hurdle. The certificate which solicitors and barristers attach to pre-nuptial agreements as evidence that each party has received independent legal advice, obviously does not reflect the advice given. However, the advice which must be given is whether in the view of the legal practitioner, the pre- or post-nuptial agreement will carry weight.

Regrettably, this is where one separates the men from the boys. There are many family practitioners who are excellent at the fact-finding mission of ascertaining assets and sourcing the correct value of those assets. Many practitioners however do not have the inclination to then commit to what is “fair.”

Many would say that in England and Wales where the present government is seemingly introducing fiscal obligations, including a burden on private pensions, marriage is one option which provides mitigation for families. The reluctance to marry, which would change the curve of the present statistics, would no doubt dissipate if the public knew that pre-nuptial agreements are worth the time, effort and money required to put a valid contract in place.

Understandably there are many who will not embark upon the task of drafting these documents and, more importantly, how often are pre- and post-nuptial agreements reviewed. There is no doubt that many agreements which will now, despite the increase in the attractiveness of these contracts in the last 15 years, carry no weight whatsoever. One also wonders whether this will open the flood gates to pre- and post-nuptial agreements being used not only by the rich and famous, but by the man or woman in the street. The costs of these documents are not unsubstantial but with the effluxion of time, these contracts should provide protection for a family’s ever-increasing asset position as they go through life, with a natural inclination for “more.”

I can recall many years ago being interviewed on national TV and debating with the editor of a national newspaper, why the man or woman in the street, who is not “rich and famous” should seriously consider this course of action for financial protection. This, in my view, is one way of taking a possible spoke out of the wheel by trying to give more longevity to marriages which deserve not to have “money” as the problem.

In conclusion, perhaps the question must be asked as to whether the Chancellor’s disliked tax provisions are in fact promoting marriage even for the anti-marriage brigade.

About the author
Charmaine Hast is a highly-regarded name in family law with experience and expertise in advising on complex, high-value and high-profile family matters, often with a cross-border element. She has represented a significant number of public figures including pop stars, actors and actresses, members of parliament, well known sportspeople, TV personalities, and entrepreneurs.

She is a member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and, as one of only a small number of Family Solicitor finance Arbitrators (CIArb), can hand down binding judgments in family law financial matters. Hast has a degree in psychology as well as law and is highly skilled at negotiating extremely favourable settlements and securing exceptional judgments for clients. She is also a qualified South African Attorney and has several reported cases, including The Supreme Court.

Among other accomplishments, Hast established the Family department at Wedlake Bell in 2011 and previously established and headed the Family team of South-East firm, TWM Solicitors. She is a member of Resolution (formerly Solicitors Family Law Association) where she was one of the first accredited specialists in high net worth financial matters and child abductions.

This article was originally published in Wealth Briefing Magazine in April 2025. You can read it here. 

Associated sectors / services

  • Family and divorce

Authors

Need some more information? Make an enquiry below.

    Subscribe

    Please add your details and your areas of interest below

    Specialist sectors:

    Legal services:

    Other information:

    Jurisdictions of interest to you (other than UK):



    Article contributors

    Enjoy reading our articles? why not subscribe to notifications so you’ll never miss one?

    Subscribe to our articles

    Message us on WhatsApp (calling not available)

    Please note that Collyer Bristow provides this service during office hours for general information and enquiries only and that no legal or other professional advice will be provided over the WhatsApp platform. Please also note that if you choose to use this platform your personal data is likely to be processed outside the UK and EEA, including in the US. Appropriate legal or other professional opinion should be taken before taking or omitting to take any action in respect of any specific problem. Collyer Bristow LLP accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may arise from reliance on information provided. All information will be deleted immediately upon completion of a conversation.

    I accept Close

    Close
    Scroll up

    Find out about Business

    Find out about Dispute Resolution

    Find out about Individuals & Families

    Find out about Real Estate

    We are Collyer Bristow - The law firm for those that
    value individuality, creativity and collaboration.

    Legal & Pricing info Regulatory InformationAccessibilitySitemapPricing and service information

    Read our latest news: Collyer Bristow secures strong results in Legal 500 UK 2026 rankings

    Read our latest article: EU Deforestation Regulation: New Sustainability Standards

    See our latest event: Future of Work: Key Updates – Seminar

    See our latest event: Beyond the Hype – Real-world AI challenges and how to overcome them

    Listen to our latest podcast: US Tax Residency Demystified: Citizens, Green Cards & the Substantial Presence Test with Alicea Castellanos

    ExpandNeed some help?Toggle

    < Back to menu

    I have an issue and need your help

    Scroll to see our A-Z list of expertise

    Get in touch

    Get in touch using our form below.



      Business Close
      Private Wealth Close
      Hot Topics Close