Shorter Reads

Can I increase divorce payments from my Ex?

Head of Family & Divorce, Toby Yerburgh, answers a reader question in the FT

2 minute read

Published 4 March 2020

Authors

Share

Key information

  • Services
  • Family and divorce

I divorced my husband twenty years ago and was awarded a small amount in a lump sum to purchase a house for myself and our two young children. So small that I had to take out a mortgage and work part time. The children are now adults but I have a court order for life for a regular payment until I re marry or die. neither of which I intend doing anytime soon.  

My ex-husband who is wealthy took me back to court seven years ago to stop my monthly payment of £836 however the judge said at the time he had over £600,000 in his pension pot, owned a house worth close to £2m, owned half his father’s house and his sister’s house and had just paid his second wife a large settlement.  He was asked to find out when he could start drawing down from his pension and value his assets. He dropped the case.  

Do I have a case to go back to court and ask for full and final settlement now I am approaching retirement age with very little pension to live on. I am now in rented accommodation as I have supported both of my children financially. 

Toby Yerburgh, Head of Family & Divorce, responds:

You are the “lucky” recipient of a joint lives spousal maintenance order which entitles you to maintenance until you remarry, die, your ex-husband dies or further order. These are increasingly rare these days with the court looking to put a term on spousal maintenance orders even where, like you, recipients are non-working mothers with young children. (This ironically aligns us closer to the position in most European countries and Scotland where spousal maintenance tends to be limited to a couple of years at most. ) That said, spousal maintenance is always variable on the application of either party. On a variation application a court will look to achieve a “clean break” if possible i.e. to bring the spousal maintenance to an end upon payment of an appropriate lump sum. This is a two stage process. The court will look to vary the maintenance figure up or down depending upon the circumstances. This will principally be based upon your own and your ex-husband’s needs and financial resources. Once the court has settled on a figure it will look to see if this can be capitalised. This will depend upon there being free capital available to your ex-husband that the court considers can be used for this purpose.

The starting point for capitalisation in a case where there is a joint lives order will be the Duxbury tables which are a set of actuarial tables used by family lawyers to work out the lump sum payable in to replace a specific net income from spousal maintenance for a recipient of a specific age. These assume among other things: constant drawdown; a 3% income yield; capital growth at 3.75%; a 3% rate of inflation; and that you will use all of the income and capital and survive for precisely as long as the average for your contemporaries.

For example, if a court decided to increase your maintenance to £15,000 pa to take account of inflation over the last 20 years and you were aged 65 at the time of the hearing the Duxbury tables suggest you would need a lump sum of £128,000. That said, if you could not persuade the court to increase the spousal maintenance figure from £10,000 pa, the starting point for the lump sum would only be £52,000.

That said, the court uses the Duxbury tables as a tool rather than a rule and is ultimately looking to achieve fairness. This could lead to an increase or a decrease in the lump sum payable depending on all of the circumstances. Ultimately though, as you can see from the Duxbury figures, there would be a significant risk to you in making an application for a variation as lump sums at this sort of level will not generate anything like the £10,000 pa net you are currently receiving.

This piece is extracted from a longer article first published in the Financial Times in March 2020.

Message us on WhatsApp

Related latest updates PREV NEXT

Arrow Back to Insights

Shorter Reads

Can I increase divorce payments from my Ex?

Head of Family & Divorce, Toby Yerburgh, answers a reader question in the FT

Published 4 March 2020

Associated sectors / services

Authors

I divorced my husband twenty years ago and was awarded a small amount in a lump sum to purchase a house for myself and our two young children. So small that I had to take out a mortgage and work part time. The children are now adults but I have a court order for life for a regular payment until I re marry or die. neither of which I intend doing anytime soon.  

My ex-husband who is wealthy took me back to court seven years ago to stop my monthly payment of £836 however the judge said at the time he had over £600,000 in his pension pot, owned a house worth close to £2m, owned half his father’s house and his sister’s house and had just paid his second wife a large settlement.  He was asked to find out when he could start drawing down from his pension and value his assets. He dropped the case.  

Do I have a case to go back to court and ask for full and final settlement now I am approaching retirement age with very little pension to live on. I am now in rented accommodation as I have supported both of my children financially. 

Toby Yerburgh, Head of Family & Divorce, responds:

You are the “lucky” recipient of a joint lives spousal maintenance order which entitles you to maintenance until you remarry, die, your ex-husband dies or further order. These are increasingly rare these days with the court looking to put a term on spousal maintenance orders even where, like you, recipients are non-working mothers with young children. (This ironically aligns us closer to the position in most European countries and Scotland where spousal maintenance tends to be limited to a couple of years at most. ) That said, spousal maintenance is always variable on the application of either party. On a variation application a court will look to achieve a “clean break” if possible i.e. to bring the spousal maintenance to an end upon payment of an appropriate lump sum. This is a two stage process. The court will look to vary the maintenance figure up or down depending upon the circumstances. This will principally be based upon your own and your ex-husband’s needs and financial resources. Once the court has settled on a figure it will look to see if this can be capitalised. This will depend upon there being free capital available to your ex-husband that the court considers can be used for this purpose.

The starting point for capitalisation in a case where there is a joint lives order will be the Duxbury tables which are a set of actuarial tables used by family lawyers to work out the lump sum payable in to replace a specific net income from spousal maintenance for a recipient of a specific age. These assume among other things: constant drawdown; a 3% income yield; capital growth at 3.75%; a 3% rate of inflation; and that you will use all of the income and capital and survive for precisely as long as the average for your contemporaries.

For example, if a court decided to increase your maintenance to £15,000 pa to take account of inflation over the last 20 years and you were aged 65 at the time of the hearing the Duxbury tables suggest you would need a lump sum of £128,000. That said, if you could not persuade the court to increase the spousal maintenance figure from £10,000 pa, the starting point for the lump sum would only be £52,000.

That said, the court uses the Duxbury tables as a tool rather than a rule and is ultimately looking to achieve fairness. This could lead to an increase or a decrease in the lump sum payable depending on all of the circumstances. Ultimately though, as you can see from the Duxbury figures, there would be a significant risk to you in making an application for a variation as lump sums at this sort of level will not generate anything like the £10,000 pa net you are currently receiving.

This piece is extracted from a longer article first published in the Financial Times in March 2020.

Associated sectors / services

Authors

Need some more information? Make an enquiry below.

    Subscribe

    Please add your details and your areas of interest below

    Specialist sectors:

    Legal services:

    Other information:

    Jurisdictions of interest to you (other than UK):

    Article contributor

    Enjoy reading our articles? why not subscribe to notifications so you’ll never miss one?

    Subscribe to our articles

    Message us on WhatsApp (calling not available)

    Please note that Collyer Bristow provides this service during office hours for general information and enquiries only and that no legal or other professional advice will be provided over the WhatsApp platform. Please also note that if you choose to use this platform your personal data is likely to be processed outside the UK and EEA, including in the US. Appropriate legal or other professional opinion should be taken before taking or omitting to take any action in respect of any specific problem. Collyer Bristow LLP accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may arise from reliance on information provided. All information will be deleted immediately upon completion of a conversation.

    I accept Close

    Close
    Scroll up
    ExpandNeed some help?Toggle

    Get in touch

    Get in touch using our form below.