Shorter Reads

No-Fault Divorce – The Verdict

Philippa Dolan, Partner in our Family Team, explores the realities of no-fault divorce and why arbitration, mediation, and other non-court dispute resolution methods are becoming essential alternatives.

3 minute read

Published 26 March 2025

Authors

Share

Key information

Philippa Dolan, one of the partners at Collyer Bristow, takes a look at developments in no-fault divorce cases in England and Wales (a different situation applies in Scotland and Northern Ireland.) Divorce is often a subject that those advising HNW individuals must consider, given the sums involved and the potential to destroy years of hard-earned wealth because of a lack of foresight and preparation.

Before 6 April 2022 the process of securing a divorce in this country was out of step with the real world and often resulted in family solicitors dancing around the truth like Regency couples in a Jane Austen novel.

By the 2020s it was just a question of going through the motions. If a couple didn’t want to wait two years from separation before getting divorced, the solicitors had to rely on desertion, adultery or, usually, “unreasonable behaviour.” We used bland concepts such as “he didn’t respect my interests” or “she didn’t like my mother.” We encouraged clients to remove references to bad behaviour because it wasn’t going to make any difference to the approach the court adopted when considering money or, probably, children’s arrangements. And it would just have made the negotiations that bit more difficult.

I don’t think I ever had a desertion petition that was contested (where one of the couple had to leave their door open for two years in the pathetic hope that the other would return). And adultery is…adultery. Gay couples couldn’t even rely on adultery, so had to use unreasonable behaviour if one of them had been unfaithful. It was all very confusing, antiquated and dishonest.

So family lawyers could not have given a warmer welcome to the no-fault legislation. And we are still pleased not to have to jump through all those mad hoops. But the change needs to be kept in perspective. By 2022 contested petitions were virtually a thing of the past anyway and couples getting divorced were arguing about money and children, just as they are today.

The no-fault process is marginally easier, and more clients are managing to do this themselves. Predictably, the court’s IT has left much to be desired but at last it’s becoming a little more user friendly. And there has been a slight reduction in bitter recriminations with the introduction of the new process. But that’s about it.

So what are the tips for keeping out of court? Certainly, the court itself provides plenty of incentives as the service is in a very poor state, and that includes some of the court buildings. The High Court is more efficient, and the calibre of the judges is generally higher so, for rich clients, the process may be less grim. Even then, the journey is usually beset with adjournments and no-show judges and it is simply impossible to speak to court staff along the way. A call centre has been set up, but no one can see your case on the screen and your emails get no response. It is time-consuming, and very expensive.

We regularly suggest alternatives to our clients (known in the trade as Non-Court Dispute Resolution). The main options are arbitration, the collaborative process, private Family Dispute Resolutions (FDRs) and mediation.

Arbitration is a form of private judging. The couple choose the arbitrator (typically a senior barrister or retired judge) and they have the power to make decisions and impose them. Arbitration is the only non-court process that has the power to impose decisions on bullying, dishonest participants and it is growing in popularity. And, importantly, the file won’t be lost and the judge will turn up.

Another non-court alternative is the collaborative process (the clue’s in the name) and then there are private FDRs. In the latter case, a private judge is chosen by the parties to give an indication as to what they would order if they were dealing with the case at court. The couple can still ignore the views expressed if they don’t like them. These non-court alternatives generally “work” but often because we’re shouting at our clients from the sidelines “Don’t Go to Court. “It’s awful.”

The most popular is mediation where a trained mediator helps the couple to reach an agreement after employing a range of techniques such as reality testing proposals and providing some carefully crafted information about the approach the court would adopt if the process failed. Information, not advice, is the key.

Finally, there’s a new powerful incentive to avoid court. In their wisdom, the judiciary has decided to allow reporters and legal bloggers into the family court. The names of the cases are published in the court list so the reporters can work out whether it’s worth their while attending. They’re looking for a billionaire, aristocrat or reality TV star whose personal life can be picked over by a prurient public. The names are anonymised in the reporting, but they often leak out. Judges can refuse their attendance but there has to be a good reason (aside from common sense) and the direction of travel is very much open court.

So calling it “no fault divorce” is all very well but the betrayals, anger, jealousy and heartbreak don’t go away just because the label has changed – and now there’s a risk that it won’t just be the lawyers who get to know your most personal secrets.

This article was originally published by WealthBriefing and can be found here.

Related latest updates
PREV NEXT

Related content

Arrow Back to Insights

Shorter Reads

No-Fault Divorce – The Verdict

Philippa Dolan, Partner in our Family Team, explores the realities of no-fault divorce and why arbitration, mediation, and other non-court dispute resolution methods are becoming essential alternatives.

Published 26 March 2025

Associated sectors / services

  • Family and divorce

Authors

Philippa Dolan, one of the partners at Collyer Bristow, takes a look at developments in no-fault divorce cases in England and Wales (a different situation applies in Scotland and Northern Ireland.) Divorce is often a subject that those advising HNW individuals must consider, given the sums involved and the potential to destroy years of hard-earned wealth because of a lack of foresight and preparation.

Before 6 April 2022 the process of securing a divorce in this country was out of step with the real world and often resulted in family solicitors dancing around the truth like Regency couples in a Jane Austen novel.

By the 2020s it was just a question of going through the motions. If a couple didn’t want to wait two years from separation before getting divorced, the solicitors had to rely on desertion, adultery or, usually, “unreasonable behaviour.” We used bland concepts such as “he didn’t respect my interests” or “she didn’t like my mother.” We encouraged clients to remove references to bad behaviour because it wasn’t going to make any difference to the approach the court adopted when considering money or, probably, children’s arrangements. And it would just have made the negotiations that bit more difficult.

I don’t think I ever had a desertion petition that was contested (where one of the couple had to leave their door open for two years in the pathetic hope that the other would return). And adultery is…adultery. Gay couples couldn’t even rely on adultery, so had to use unreasonable behaviour if one of them had been unfaithful. It was all very confusing, antiquated and dishonest.

So family lawyers could not have given a warmer welcome to the no-fault legislation. And we are still pleased not to have to jump through all those mad hoops. But the change needs to be kept in perspective. By 2022 contested petitions were virtually a thing of the past anyway and couples getting divorced were arguing about money and children, just as they are today.

The no-fault process is marginally easier, and more clients are managing to do this themselves. Predictably, the court’s IT has left much to be desired but at last it’s becoming a little more user friendly. And there has been a slight reduction in bitter recriminations with the introduction of the new process. But that’s about it.

So what are the tips for keeping out of court? Certainly, the court itself provides plenty of incentives as the service is in a very poor state, and that includes some of the court buildings. The High Court is more efficient, and the calibre of the judges is generally higher so, for rich clients, the process may be less grim. Even then, the journey is usually beset with adjournments and no-show judges and it is simply impossible to speak to court staff along the way. A call centre has been set up, but no one can see your case on the screen and your emails get no response. It is time-consuming, and very expensive.

We regularly suggest alternatives to our clients (known in the trade as Non-Court Dispute Resolution). The main options are arbitration, the collaborative process, private Family Dispute Resolutions (FDRs) and mediation.

Arbitration is a form of private judging. The couple choose the arbitrator (typically a senior barrister or retired judge) and they have the power to make decisions and impose them. Arbitration is the only non-court process that has the power to impose decisions on bullying, dishonest participants and it is growing in popularity. And, importantly, the file won’t be lost and the judge will turn up.

Another non-court alternative is the collaborative process (the clue’s in the name) and then there are private FDRs. In the latter case, a private judge is chosen by the parties to give an indication as to what they would order if they were dealing with the case at court. The couple can still ignore the views expressed if they don’t like them. These non-court alternatives generally “work” but often because we’re shouting at our clients from the sidelines “Don’t Go to Court. “It’s awful.”

The most popular is mediation where a trained mediator helps the couple to reach an agreement after employing a range of techniques such as reality testing proposals and providing some carefully crafted information about the approach the court would adopt if the process failed. Information, not advice, is the key.

Finally, there’s a new powerful incentive to avoid court. In their wisdom, the judiciary has decided to allow reporters and legal bloggers into the family court. The names of the cases are published in the court list so the reporters can work out whether it’s worth their while attending. They’re looking for a billionaire, aristocrat or reality TV star whose personal life can be picked over by a prurient public. The names are anonymised in the reporting, but they often leak out. Judges can refuse their attendance but there has to be a good reason (aside from common sense) and the direction of travel is very much open court.

So calling it “no fault divorce” is all very well but the betrayals, anger, jealousy and heartbreak don’t go away just because the label has changed – and now there’s a risk that it won’t just be the lawyers who get to know your most personal secrets.

This article was originally published by WealthBriefing and can be found here.

Associated sectors / services

  • Family and divorce

Authors

Need some more information? Make an enquiry below.

    Subscribe

    Please add your details and your areas of interest below

    Specialist sectors:

    Legal services:

    Other information:

    Jurisdictions of interest to you (other than UK):



    Article contributor

    Enjoy reading our articles? why not subscribe to notifications so you’ll never miss one?

    Subscribe to our articles

    Message us on WhatsApp (calling not available)

    Please note that Collyer Bristow provides this service during office hours for general information and enquiries only and that no legal or other professional advice will be provided over the WhatsApp platform. Please also note that if you choose to use this platform your personal data is likely to be processed outside the UK and EEA, including in the US. Appropriate legal or other professional opinion should be taken before taking or omitting to take any action in respect of any specific problem. Collyer Bristow LLP accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may arise from reliance on information provided. All information will be deleted immediately upon completion of a conversation.

    I accept Close

    Close
    Scroll up

    Find out about Business

    Find out about Dispute Resolution

    Find out about Individuals & Families

    Find out about Real Estate

    We are Collyer Bristow - The law firm for those that
    value individuality, creativity and collaboration.

    Legal & Pricing info Regulatory InformationAccessibilitySitemapPricing and service information

    Read our latest article: Family Court Statistics – A True Reflection?

    Read our latest article: Data Governance Act (DGA): Regulation (EU) 2022/868

    Read our latest article: Ensuring confidentiality of sensitive data in the workplace

    Read our latest news: Collyer Bristow advises Moulton Goodies on the sale of He-Man Dual Controls

    Read our latest news: Write your next chapter | apply for your Training Contract with Collyer Bristow

    ExpandNeed some help?Toggle

    < Back to menu

    I have an issue and need your help

    Scroll to see our A-Z list of expertise

    Get in touch

    Get in touch using our form below.



      Business Close
      Private Wealth Close
      Hot Topics Close