Shorter Reads

What is a Reconciliation Agreement?

As all keen (and even not so keen) observers of celebrity couples are aware, shortly before Beniffer collapsed like a celebrity supernova, Rory McIlroy and his wife Erica, having seemed set to do the same, blindsided the tabloids by getting back together. In doing so they introduced the British public to a concept about which most had been previously unaware: the reconciliation contract.

2 minute read

Published 16 September 2024

Authors

Share

Key information

As all keen (and even not so keen) observers of celebrity couples are aware, shortly before ‘Beniffer’ collapsed like a celebrity supernova, Rory McIlroy and his wife Erica, having seemed set to do the same, blindsided the tabloids by getting back together. In doing so they introduced the British public to a concept about which most had been previously unaware: the reconciliation contract.

What is a reconciliation contract, and does it stand any chance of being recognised by the English court system? 

Well, as with prenuptial contracts, these started out as a distinctly North American phenomena, no doubt invented by Californian divorce lawyers, who have always been creative in the ways in which they are able to assist their demanding clients. The idea is that not all separating couples stay separated and after each of them has spent enough time with their respective therapists and lawyers that they may start to think that the alternative of spending time with their spouse is not as bad as they first thought, particularly if they can reset the ground-rules for their relationship going forward. And how better to do this than by pledging their renewed commitment to one another in a contract that, if broken will at least have the advantage of setting out what should happen if they do change their minds again and split up permanently?

A reconciliation contract is, therefore, no more or less than a post-nuptial contract and, as such is a rather more familiar concept in the English and Welsh courts than it appears at first sight. In fact, Marriage Settlements have been recognised here since before the 18th century and postnuptial agreements were given recognition by the Privy Council before prenuptial contracts were recognised by the Supreme Court upon the basis that they were effectively a type of Marriage Settlement.  As with prenuptial agreements, a postnup (and hence a reconciliation agreement)  will be given substantial weight by the court provided there has been full financial disclosure, independent legal advice, lack of coercion and the agreement is basically fair.

What are the differences in approach to separation between UK and USA?

At this point it should be noted that there is a distinct difference between what a US based lawyer might think appropriate to put into such an agreement and what an English lawyer is likely to advise. Primarily, both lawyers will be concentrating on the financial division which will be made between the parties on divorce and the extent to which assets or asset classes are protected from claims. However, even on a prenup a US lawyer may well include lists of expectations that each client has of the other at the start of the marriage e.g. from how joint accounts and mortgages are to be funded and what contributions are to be made to house running costs to who is going to take out the garbage and even how often the couple are to be intimate together. Expectations about future childcare can also be found in such documents as can clauses that have the effect of denying any alimony in the event that a party is unfaithful.  These terms are routinely enforced by US courts (with parties sometimes being awarded damages for breach). This is all rather alien to the English courts.

In the case of US reconciliation agreements, the same applies and many of the same type of clauses will find their way into such agreements. In particular, one might expect to see clauses about commitments to attend couples’ therapy, how much time each party will spent looking after the children, the acceptable use of social media, rules for contact with the press and what behaviour is acceptable when the couple are on holiday together e.g. not spending all day in contact with the office. While such clauses might also be inserted into an English law reconciliation agreement,  this would be upon the basis that these were aspirations and that the court, if ever asked to do so, is likely to ignore any such provisions and will not allow for a forensic investigation as to whether such terms have been breached. Nor is an English court  likely condone any suggestion that the financial settlement should be susceptible to being increased or decreased as a result. Even provisions relating to child contact are not going to be upheld by the English court unless deemed to be in the best interests of the children.

How useful are reconciliation agreements in an English law context?

The answer will depend upon whether there is a pre or post nuptial agreement already. If there is, then unless this needs a complete overhaul, it would usually be sensible to leave this in place and not try to renegotiate it (although this is obviously a possibility).  If there is not, then a reconciliation agreement could help to avoid a costly dispute over assets on a future divorce if the reconciliation fails. That said, negotiating such an agreement is always going to require a great deal of diplomacy and careful handling as any disagreements may well entrench the separation rather than heal it and expectations are going to need to be managed as to the likelihood of the English Family court paying any attention to the more aspirant parts of such an agreement.  Accordingly, this is not necessarily the best time to be hiring a rottweiler.

Related latest updates
PREV NEXT

Related content

Arrow Back to Insights

Shorter Reads

What is a Reconciliation Agreement?

As all keen (and even not so keen) observers of celebrity couples are aware, shortly before Beniffer collapsed like a celebrity supernova, Rory McIlroy and his wife Erica, having seemed set to do the same, blindsided the tabloids by getting back together. In doing so they introduced the British public to a concept about which most had been previously unaware: the reconciliation contract.

Published 16 September 2024

Associated sectors / services

  • Family and divorce

Authors

As all keen (and even not so keen) observers of celebrity couples are aware, shortly before ‘Beniffer’ collapsed like a celebrity supernova, Rory McIlroy and his wife Erica, having seemed set to do the same, blindsided the tabloids by getting back together. In doing so they introduced the British public to a concept about which most had been previously unaware: the reconciliation contract.

What is a reconciliation contract, and does it stand any chance of being recognised by the English court system? 

Well, as with prenuptial contracts, these started out as a distinctly North American phenomena, no doubt invented by Californian divorce lawyers, who have always been creative in the ways in which they are able to assist their demanding clients. The idea is that not all separating couples stay separated and after each of them has spent enough time with their respective therapists and lawyers that they may start to think that the alternative of spending time with their spouse is not as bad as they first thought, particularly if they can reset the ground-rules for their relationship going forward. And how better to do this than by pledging their renewed commitment to one another in a contract that, if broken will at least have the advantage of setting out what should happen if they do change their minds again and split up permanently?

A reconciliation contract is, therefore, no more or less than a post-nuptial contract and, as such is a rather more familiar concept in the English and Welsh courts than it appears at first sight. In fact, Marriage Settlements have been recognised here since before the 18th century and postnuptial agreements were given recognition by the Privy Council before prenuptial contracts were recognised by the Supreme Court upon the basis that they were effectively a type of Marriage Settlement.  As with prenuptial agreements, a postnup (and hence a reconciliation agreement)  will be given substantial weight by the court provided there has been full financial disclosure, independent legal advice, lack of coercion and the agreement is basically fair.

What are the differences in approach to separation between UK and USA?

At this point it should be noted that there is a distinct difference between what a US based lawyer might think appropriate to put into such an agreement and what an English lawyer is likely to advise. Primarily, both lawyers will be concentrating on the financial division which will be made between the parties on divorce and the extent to which assets or asset classes are protected from claims. However, even on a prenup a US lawyer may well include lists of expectations that each client has of the other at the start of the marriage e.g. from how joint accounts and mortgages are to be funded and what contributions are to be made to house running costs to who is going to take out the garbage and even how often the couple are to be intimate together. Expectations about future childcare can also be found in such documents as can clauses that have the effect of denying any alimony in the event that a party is unfaithful.  These terms are routinely enforced by US courts (with parties sometimes being awarded damages for breach). This is all rather alien to the English courts.

In the case of US reconciliation agreements, the same applies and many of the same type of clauses will find their way into such agreements. In particular, one might expect to see clauses about commitments to attend couples’ therapy, how much time each party will spent looking after the children, the acceptable use of social media, rules for contact with the press and what behaviour is acceptable when the couple are on holiday together e.g. not spending all day in contact with the office. While such clauses might also be inserted into an English law reconciliation agreement,  this would be upon the basis that these were aspirations and that the court, if ever asked to do so, is likely to ignore any such provisions and will not allow for a forensic investigation as to whether such terms have been breached. Nor is an English court  likely condone any suggestion that the financial settlement should be susceptible to being increased or decreased as a result. Even provisions relating to child contact are not going to be upheld by the English court unless deemed to be in the best interests of the children.

How useful are reconciliation agreements in an English law context?

The answer will depend upon whether there is a pre or post nuptial agreement already. If there is, then unless this needs a complete overhaul, it would usually be sensible to leave this in place and not try to renegotiate it (although this is obviously a possibility).  If there is not, then a reconciliation agreement could help to avoid a costly dispute over assets on a future divorce if the reconciliation fails. That said, negotiating such an agreement is always going to require a great deal of diplomacy and careful handling as any disagreements may well entrench the separation rather than heal it and expectations are going to need to be managed as to the likelihood of the English Family court paying any attention to the more aspirant parts of such an agreement.  Accordingly, this is not necessarily the best time to be hiring a rottweiler.

Associated sectors / services

  • Family and divorce

Authors

Need some more information? Make an enquiry below.

    Subscribe

    Please add your details and your areas of interest below

    Specialist sectors:

    Legal services:

    Other information:

    Jurisdictions of interest to you (other than UK):



    Article contributor

    Enjoy reading our articles? why not subscribe to notifications so you’ll never miss one?

    Subscribe to our articles

    Message us on WhatsApp (calling not available)

    Please note that Collyer Bristow provides this service during office hours for general information and enquiries only and that no legal or other professional advice will be provided over the WhatsApp platform. Please also note that if you choose to use this platform your personal data is likely to be processed outside the UK and EEA, including in the US. Appropriate legal or other professional opinion should be taken before taking or omitting to take any action in respect of any specific problem. Collyer Bristow LLP accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may arise from reliance on information provided. All information will be deleted immediately upon completion of a conversation.

    I accept Close

    Close
    Scroll up

    Find out about Business

    Find out about Dispute Resolution

    Find out about Individuals & Families

    Find out about Real Estate

    We are Collyer Bristow - The law firm for those that
    value individuality, creativity and collaboration.

    Legal & Pricing info Regulatory InformationAccessibilitySitemapPricing and service information

    Listen to our latest podcast: Budget Miniseries: Impacts on Families with US Connections (Part 1)

    Listen to our latest podcast: Cracking the Code on Directors’ Service Agreements

    Read our latest article: Economist, or just economical with the truth? How can employers respond to ‘fake claims’ on a CV?

    Listen to our latest podcast: Autumn Budget 2024 Special (Part 2)

    Read our latest article: ‘Promoting the integrity of the register’: The new Companies House approach to non-compliance

    ExpandNeed some help?Toggle

    < Back to menu

    I have an issue and need your help

    Scroll to see our A-Z list of expertise

    Get in touch

    Get in touch using our form below.



      Business Close
      Private Wealth Close
      Hot Topics Close