Shorter Reads

Monitoring staff – employers should not expect to see staff chained to their desks all day

The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) has today published a report on views and attitudes to the monitoring of staff working from home.

1 minute read

Published 20 October 2022

Authors

Share

Key information

It reports that over half of bosses agree that at least one form of monitoring for home workers is acceptable to identify burnout.

Bosses (CEOs, partners, owners) were found to be more likely in favour of monitoring compared to senior managers, with HR staff being the least enthusiastic about it.

Collection of this data can be vital to some businesses, and it is possible for employers to justify these practices.

Indeed, many businesses have been monitoring individual productivity for some time and well before the explosion of home working. For example, in the legal sector, this data is used as the basis for charging clients.

But employers must consider and respect the data rights of workers. Where monitoring is necessary and justified, they must ensure staff are aware it is going on and put in place the appropriate notices and policies. The purpose for which monitoring is conducted and the data is collected is key to justifying an employer’s conduct.

There is a risk that staff perceive even light monitoring as far more invasive, particularly if they are being monitored in their home. So employers need to ensure they act proportionately and explain to staff the justification for monitoring.

When analysing this data, employers need to be aware that modes of work have changed over recent years. Traditional forms of working have been disrupted by the spread of positive physical and mental health practices and replaced with more flexible and agile modes of working.

Employers should not expect to see staff chained to their desk for the entire working day, but should look at outcomes and achievements when considering productivity.

For more information, consult our Employment page.

Related latest updates
PREV NEXT

Related content

Arrow Back to Insights

Shorter Reads

Monitoring staff – employers should not expect to see staff chained to their desks all day

The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) has today published a report on views and attitudes to the monitoring of staff working from home.

Published 20 October 2022

Associated sectors / services

  • Data Protection
  • Employment law for employees
  • Employment law for employers

Authors

It reports that over half of bosses agree that at least one form of monitoring for home workers is acceptable to identify burnout.

Bosses (CEOs, partners, owners) were found to be more likely in favour of monitoring compared to senior managers, with HR staff being the least enthusiastic about it.

Collection of this data can be vital to some businesses, and it is possible for employers to justify these practices.

Indeed, many businesses have been monitoring individual productivity for some time and well before the explosion of home working. For example, in the legal sector, this data is used as the basis for charging clients.

But employers must consider and respect the data rights of workers. Where monitoring is necessary and justified, they must ensure staff are aware it is going on and put in place the appropriate notices and policies. The purpose for which monitoring is conducted and the data is collected is key to justifying an employer’s conduct.

There is a risk that staff perceive even light monitoring as far more invasive, particularly if they are being monitored in their home. So employers need to ensure they act proportionately and explain to staff the justification for monitoring.

When analysing this data, employers need to be aware that modes of work have changed over recent years. Traditional forms of working have been disrupted by the spread of positive physical and mental health practices and replaced with more flexible and agile modes of working.

Employers should not expect to see staff chained to their desk for the entire working day, but should look at outcomes and achievements when considering productivity.

For more information, consult our Employment page.

Associated sectors / services

  • Data Protection
  • Employment law for employees
  • Employment law for employers

Authors

Need some more information? Make an enquiry below.

    Subscribe

    Please add your details and your areas of interest below

    Specialist sectors:

    Legal services:

    Other information:

    Jurisdictions of interest to you (other than UK):

    Article contributor

    Enjoy reading our articles? why not subscribe to notifications so you’ll never miss one?

    Subscribe to our articles

    Message us on WhatsApp (calling not available)

    Please note that Collyer Bristow provides this service during office hours for general information and enquiries only and that no legal or other professional advice will be provided over the WhatsApp platform. Please also note that if you choose to use this platform your personal data is likely to be processed outside the UK and EEA, including in the US. Appropriate legal or other professional opinion should be taken before taking or omitting to take any action in respect of any specific problem. Collyer Bristow LLP accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may arise from reliance on information provided. All information will be deleted immediately upon completion of a conversation.

    I accept Close

    Close
    Scroll up

    Find out about Business

    Find out about Dispute Resolution

    Find out about Individuals & Families

    Find out about Real Estate

    We are Collyer Bristow - The law firm for those that
    value individuality, creativity and collaboration.

    Legal & Pricing info Regulatory InformationAccessibilitySitemapPricing and service information

    Read our latest article: Is working from home actually more productive?

    Listen to our latest podcast: Jumping across the Atlantic?

    Read our latest article: Regulators respond to government’s ‘pro-innovation approach to AI regulation’

    Read our latest article: Lawyers react as FCA promises ‘prompt action’ over politically exposed persons review

    Listen to our latest podcast: Decision making at board and shareholder level

    ExpandNeed a hand?Toggle

    < Back to menu

    I have an issue and need your help

    Scroll to see our A-Z list of expertise

    Get in touch

    Get in touch using our form below.



      Business Close
      Private Wealth Close
      Hot Topics Close