- Employment law for employees
Shorter Reads
Associate Daniel Zona from the Employment team shares his thoughts on these potential anti-strike laws.
1 minute read
Published 5 January 2023
The government is reported to be considering a change in strike laws that would bring in “minimum service level” requirements across six sectors, including health, rail and education. Under the proposed changes, a strike could be deemed unlawful if unions or their members refuse to provide a minimum level of service when strikes are organised, and employers would be able to take legal action against unions and their members. It is reported that Sunak will also make it lawful for an employer to dismiss an employee who refuses to provide a minimum level of service.
The clear and obvious purpose of the proposed changes is to diminish and curtail the effectiveness of strike action in those six sectors. Employers may find they are able to effectively disregard strike action, or at least give it less significance, in negotiations with unions if they’re still able to provide a minimum service.
If made law, these changes could amount to one of the most significant curbs on the fundamental right to strike in recent decades. It could in effect amount to forcing some workers to work against their will. The proposed changes could breach human rights legislation and potentially modern slavery laws.
It is likely the proposed changes would be counterproductive and lead to further disruption and legal challenges by unions and other interested groups. The government will reportedly formally announce the new changes in the coming days.
For more information, visit our Employment Law for Employees page.
Related content
Shorter Reads
Associate Daniel Zona from the Employment team shares his thoughts on these potential anti-strike laws.
Published 5 January 2023
The government is reported to be considering a change in strike laws that would bring in “minimum service level” requirements across six sectors, including health, rail and education. Under the proposed changes, a strike could be deemed unlawful if unions or their members refuse to provide a minimum level of service when strikes are organised, and employers would be able to take legal action against unions and their members. It is reported that Sunak will also make it lawful for an employer to dismiss an employee who refuses to provide a minimum level of service.
The clear and obvious purpose of the proposed changes is to diminish and curtail the effectiveness of strike action in those six sectors. Employers may find they are able to effectively disregard strike action, or at least give it less significance, in negotiations with unions if they’re still able to provide a minimum service.
If made law, these changes could amount to one of the most significant curbs on the fundamental right to strike in recent decades. It could in effect amount to forcing some workers to work against their will. The proposed changes could breach human rights legislation and potentially modern slavery laws.
It is likely the proposed changes would be counterproductive and lead to further disruption and legal challenges by unions and other interested groups. The government will reportedly formally announce the new changes in the coming days.
For more information, visit our Employment Law for Employees page.
Need some more information? Make an enquiry below.
Subscribe
Please add your details and your areas of interest below
Article contributor
Associate
Specialising in Employment law for employers, Digital and Employment law for employees
Enjoy reading our articles? why not subscribe to notifications so you’ll never miss one?
Subscribe to our articlesPlease note that Collyer Bristow provides this service during office hours for general information and enquiries only and that no legal or other professional advice will be provided over the WhatsApp platform. Please also note that if you choose to use this platform your personal data is likely to be processed outside the UK and EEA, including in the US. Appropriate legal or other professional opinion should be taken before taking or omitting to take any action in respect of any specific problem. Collyer Bristow LLP accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may arise from reliance on information provided. All information will be deleted immediately upon completion of a conversation.
Close