Longer Reads

Employee dismissed for ‘not typing enough’ – what must an employer consider when monitoring its employees?

Our Employment team share their advice on employee monitoring, particularly in the context of hybrid working.

1 minute read

Published 11 August 2023

Authors

Share

Key information

An Australian employment case made the news recently after an employee had her employment terminated because she was ‘not typing enough’.

The employee worked predominately from home and, in order to monitor her as part of a performance improvement plan, AIG used specialist keystroke software to examine how often she pressed the keys on her keyboard. The software found that she had ‘very low keystroke activity’ from October to December 2022, with the employee recording a total of 320 hours with zero strokes across these months. The employee subsequently brought a claim of unfair dismissal against her former employer, which was rejected by Australia’s Fair Work Commission last month.

The case highlights some interesting considerations for employers when it comes to employee monitoring, particularly in the context of hybrid working.

Indeed, when monitoring employee productivity, employers must firstly consider and respect the data rights of its employees. There are a number of aspects of the data protection legislation that an employer will need to consider and the purposes for which monitoring is conducted and the data is collected are key to justifying an employer’s conduct. The Information Commissioner gives examples of potential reasons to conduct employee monitoring, including to allow employees to work safely in a different environment, or to protect the business from theft, complaints or legal action.

In the UK, where monitoring is both necessary and justified, employers must also ensure that employees are aware that they are being monitored and put in place the appropriate notices and policies. Employers should also consider the risk that the monitoring could encroach into the employee’s personal lives – could it capture personal emails and calls for example?

Employers should also consider whether the aim of the monitoring could be achieved in another way – for example by regular check in meetings between the employee and their line manager.

If an employer believes the monitoring is necessary, they should endeavour to be as open and transparent as possible with their employees and consider the least intrusive route.

It’s likely that employees will perceive even light monitoring as fairly invasive of their privacy, particularly if they are being monitored in their home. Employees need to understand how they are being monitored and what is expected of them, therefore an employee monitoring policy is crucial.

Although employees are arguably likely to be more productive when they know they are being monitored, employers should also consider how monitoring may impact the wider relationship with their employees. Employees may perceive that their employer does not trust them, and that can impact the culture of the business.

Ultimately, given that hybrid working isn’t disappearing anytime soon, employee monitoring is likely to remain part of the discussion.

If you have any queries regarding employee monitoring, please visit our Employment Lawyers page to get in touch.

Related latest updates
PREV NEXT

Related content

Arrow Back to Insights

Longer Reads

Employee dismissed for ‘not typing enough’ – what must an employer consider when monitoring its employees?

Our Employment team share their advice on employee monitoring, particularly in the context of hybrid working.

Published 11 August 2023

Associated sectors / services

  • Employment law for employers

Authors

An Australian employment case made the news recently after an employee had her employment terminated because she was ‘not typing enough’.

The employee worked predominately from home and, in order to monitor her as part of a performance improvement plan, AIG used specialist keystroke software to examine how often she pressed the keys on her keyboard. The software found that she had ‘very low keystroke activity’ from October to December 2022, with the employee recording a total of 320 hours with zero strokes across these months. The employee subsequently brought a claim of unfair dismissal against her former employer, which was rejected by Australia’s Fair Work Commission last month.

The case highlights some interesting considerations for employers when it comes to employee monitoring, particularly in the context of hybrid working.

Indeed, when monitoring employee productivity, employers must firstly consider and respect the data rights of its employees. There are a number of aspects of the data protection legislation that an employer will need to consider and the purposes for which monitoring is conducted and the data is collected are key to justifying an employer’s conduct. The Information Commissioner gives examples of potential reasons to conduct employee monitoring, including to allow employees to work safely in a different environment, or to protect the business from theft, complaints or legal action.

In the UK, where monitoring is both necessary and justified, employers must also ensure that employees are aware that they are being monitored and put in place the appropriate notices and policies. Employers should also consider the risk that the monitoring could encroach into the employee’s personal lives – could it capture personal emails and calls for example?

Employers should also consider whether the aim of the monitoring could be achieved in another way – for example by regular check in meetings between the employee and their line manager.

If an employer believes the monitoring is necessary, they should endeavour to be as open and transparent as possible with their employees and consider the least intrusive route.

It’s likely that employees will perceive even light monitoring as fairly invasive of their privacy, particularly if they are being monitored in their home. Employees need to understand how they are being monitored and what is expected of them, therefore an employee monitoring policy is crucial.

Although employees are arguably likely to be more productive when they know they are being monitored, employers should also consider how monitoring may impact the wider relationship with their employees. Employees may perceive that their employer does not trust them, and that can impact the culture of the business.

Ultimately, given that hybrid working isn’t disappearing anytime soon, employee monitoring is likely to remain part of the discussion.

If you have any queries regarding employee monitoring, please visit our Employment Lawyers page to get in touch.

Associated sectors / services

  • Employment law for employers

Authors

Need some more information? Make an enquiry below.

    Subscribe

    Please add your details and your areas of interest below

    Specialist sectors:

    Legal services:

    Other information:

    Jurisdictions of interest to you (other than UK):



    Article contributor

    Enjoy reading our articles? why not subscribe to notifications so you’ll never miss one?

    Subscribe to our articles

    Message us on WhatsApp (calling not available)

    Please note that Collyer Bristow provides this service during office hours for general information and enquiries only and that no legal or other professional advice will be provided over the WhatsApp platform. Please also note that if you choose to use this platform your personal data is likely to be processed outside the UK and EEA, including in the US. Appropriate legal or other professional opinion should be taken before taking or omitting to take any action in respect of any specific problem. Collyer Bristow LLP accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may arise from reliance on information provided. All information will be deleted immediately upon completion of a conversation.

    I accept Close

    Close
    Scroll up

    Find out about Business

    Find out about Dispute Resolution

    Find out about Individuals & Families

    Find out about Real Estate

    We are Collyer Bristow - The law firm for those that
    value individuality, creativity and collaboration.

    Legal & Pricing info Regulatory InformationAccessibilitySitemapPricing and service information

    Listen to our latest podcast: BHS Judgment #2 – Trading Misfeasance

    Listen to our latest podcast: BHS Judgment #1 – Wrongful trading

    Read our latest article: Sexual Harassment & the risk of relying on workplace ‘banter’ to defend a claim

    Listen to our latest podcast: No notice, no claim? (Drax v Scottish Power)

    Read our latest article: Election 2024: Domicile, Inheritance Tax, and change promised by the new Labour government

    ExpandNeed some help?Toggle

    < Back to menu

    I have an issue and need your help

    Scroll to see our A-Z list of expertise

    Get in touch

    Get in touch using our form below.



      Business Close
      Private Wealth Close
      Hot Topics Close