- Employment law for employers
Shorter Reads
Associate Daniel Zona and Trainee Solicitor Luke Naylor comment on this slippery case.
1 minute read
Published 13 April 2023
Kesarajith Perera took former employer Stonegate Pub Company to an employment tribunal with allegations of racial and religious harassment and cited an incident where he slipped on an oil spill at The George in Harrow in 2020 as evidence. Perera was laughed at by team leader Thameera Bandara after his fall and even claimed that Bandara had intentionally spilled oil to cause him to slip.
The judge ruled that laughing at someone when they fall over at work did not constitute harassment in this case.
Employers must be able to distinguish between complaints of harassment under the Equality Act 2010, which naturally involve an element of discrimination, and general complaints of bullying which do not necessarily involve discrimination.
For the former, a complaint of harassment would also likely amount to a ‘Protected Act’ if it relates to discrimination. Therefore, even if a complaint of harassment is unfounded, as with Mr Perera, an employer could risk a further complaint of victimisation if they cause any detriment to the employee because of their complaint.
For more information, please visit our Employment Lawyers page.
These comments were first published in HR Magazine on the 13th of April 2023.
Related content
Shorter Reads
Associate Daniel Zona and Trainee Solicitor Luke Naylor comment on this slippery case.
Published 13 April 2023
Kesarajith Perera took former employer Stonegate Pub Company to an employment tribunal with allegations of racial and religious harassment and cited an incident where he slipped on an oil spill at The George in Harrow in 2020 as evidence. Perera was laughed at by team leader Thameera Bandara after his fall and even claimed that Bandara had intentionally spilled oil to cause him to slip.
The judge ruled that laughing at someone when they fall over at work did not constitute harassment in this case.
Employers must be able to distinguish between complaints of harassment under the Equality Act 2010, which naturally involve an element of discrimination, and general complaints of bullying which do not necessarily involve discrimination.
For the former, a complaint of harassment would also likely amount to a ‘Protected Act’ if it relates to discrimination. Therefore, even if a complaint of harassment is unfounded, as with Mr Perera, an employer could risk a further complaint of victimisation if they cause any detriment to the employee because of their complaint.
For more information, please visit our Employment Lawyers page.
These comments were first published in HR Magazine on the 13th of April 2023.
Need some more information? Make an enquiry below.
Subscribe
Please add your details and your areas of interest below
Article contributors
Associate
Specialising in Employment law for employers, Digital and Employment law for employees
Trainee Solicitor
Specialising in Training
Enjoy reading our articles? why not subscribe to notifications so you’ll never miss one?
Subscribe to our articlesPlease note that Collyer Bristow provides this service during office hours for general information and enquiries only and that no legal or other professional advice will be provided over the WhatsApp platform. Please also note that if you choose to use this platform your personal data is likely to be processed outside the UK and EEA, including in the US. Appropriate legal or other professional opinion should be taken before taking or omitting to take any action in respect of any specific problem. Collyer Bristow LLP accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may arise from reliance on information provided. All information will be deleted immediately upon completion of a conversation.
Close