- Employment law for employees
- Employment law for employers
- Financial services
Shorter Reads
Citibank has won an employment tribunal after dismissing a worker who claimed subsistence expenses for himself and his partner, and denied it.
1 minute read
Published 16 October 2023
Citibank has won an employment tribunal after dismissing a worker who claimed subsistence expenses for himself and his partner, and denied it.
Szabolcs Fekete had accused the bank of unfair dismissal after he was fired in 2022 for gross misconduct. He initially claimed that he had personally consumed two sandwiches, two coffees and two pasta dishes during a solo business trip to Amsterdam. He later admitted that his partner had shared the items.
Head of Employment, Tania Goodman, comments on the matter:
“Whilst the amounts involved in this banker’s expense claims were modest, the fact is he claimed some of his expenses dishonestly and when asked about it by his employer, he lied, thereby compounding his deceit. This constitutes theft and gross misconduct for which the sanction is usually dismissal. Furthermore, the implied duty of trust and confidence underpins all employment relationships and once it’s gone, it’s gone. No doubt a bank must ensure that its staff are honest for many reasons, not least reputation management. Perhaps the employee would have been given a second chance in another industry and he clearly miscalculated the gravity of the situation”
The findings of the employment tribunal can be found here.
Related content
Shorter Reads
Citibank has won an employment tribunal after dismissing a worker who claimed subsistence expenses for himself and his partner, and denied it.
Published 16 October 2023
Citibank has won an employment tribunal after dismissing a worker who claimed subsistence expenses for himself and his partner, and denied it.
Szabolcs Fekete had accused the bank of unfair dismissal after he was fired in 2022 for gross misconduct. He initially claimed that he had personally consumed two sandwiches, two coffees and two pasta dishes during a solo business trip to Amsterdam. He later admitted that his partner had shared the items.
Head of Employment, Tania Goodman, comments on the matter:
“Whilst the amounts involved in this banker’s expense claims were modest, the fact is he claimed some of his expenses dishonestly and when asked about it by his employer, he lied, thereby compounding his deceit. This constitutes theft and gross misconduct for which the sanction is usually dismissal. Furthermore, the implied duty of trust and confidence underpins all employment relationships and once it’s gone, it’s gone. No doubt a bank must ensure that its staff are honest for many reasons, not least reputation management. Perhaps the employee would have been given a second chance in another industry and he clearly miscalculated the gravity of the situation”
The findings of the employment tribunal can be found here.
Need some more information? Make an enquiry below.
Subscribe
Please add your details and your areas of interest below
Article contributor
Partner - Head of Employment
Specialising in Employment law for employees and Employment law for employers
Enjoy reading our articles? why not subscribe to notifications so you’ll never miss one?
Subscribe to our articlesPlease note that Collyer Bristow provides this service during office hours for general information and enquiries only and that no legal or other professional advice will be provided over the WhatsApp platform. Please also note that if you choose to use this platform your personal data is likely to be processed outside the UK and EEA, including in the US. Appropriate legal or other professional opinion should be taken before taking or omitting to take any action in respect of any specific problem. Collyer Bristow LLP accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may arise from reliance on information provided. All information will be deleted immediately upon completion of a conversation.
Close