-
Archives
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- January 2017
- December 2014
- September 2014
- June 2014
-
Meta
Monthly Archives: December 2017
Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency in Divorce Proceedings
This interesting article looks at some of the implications of Bitcoin and blockchain technology on divorce law.Bitcoin has burst into public consciousness in the past few weeks as values have shot past £10,000 per Bitcoin. There are now in excess of 3m Bitcoin owners and many long-term investors may find themselves unexpectedly well off.Bitcoin, and cryptocurrencies generally, can cause huge problems in divorce proceedings. The decentralised and anonymised nature of blockchain records makes it very difficult to identify whether and how much of a digital currency a spouse might own unless you can track the original purchase through an exchange. The issue is further complicated by the fact that few lawyers, and fewer judges, really have any handle on what cryptocurrencies even are.On that front we are delighted that Nigel Brahams, one of the country’s leading blockchain lawyers, joined Collyer Bristow last week as a partner in our our Corporate and Commercial team. Not only is this obviously great news for our existing Fintech and commercial clients, but on the family law front it ensures we are able to remain at the forefront of dealing with complex and high-value divorce work, whatever assets those might involve.
Posted in Shorter Reads
Tagged digital
Comments Off on Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency in Divorce Proceedings
Socialite Tara Palmer-Tomkinson left her fortune to children she never had
In a Will signed some 13 years before her death, socialite Tara Palmer-Tomkinson left her £2.3m fortune to children she never had.Miss Palmer-Tomkinson died childless at the age of 45 in February 2016.It is a case which again highlights the importance of continually keeping your Will under review.
Posted in Shorter Reads
Comments Off on Socialite Tara Palmer-Tomkinson left her fortune to children she never had
Worker entitled to backdated holiday pay
Two of the hottest topics in employment law recently have been worker status and holiday pay. There have been cases on whether Uber drivers, and others working in the “gig economy”, should be treated as workers rather than self-employed contractors, and therefore be entitled to benefits including holiday pay. And there has also been a series of cases about how holiday pay should be calculated, and that it should include elements such as commission as well as basic salary. These two topics have come together in an important decision from the European Court of Justice. Mr King worked for The Sash Window Workshop and was engaged (by his own choice) as a self-employed contractor. As such he did not get paid holiday. However, after he left the company, he brought a claim in respect of holiday pay that he says he should have received. The UK Employment Tribunal held that Mr King was in fact a worker rather than self-employed. Therefore he should have been entitled to paid holiday. Normally, employees have to take holiday in the relevant holiday year, or lose it, so a claim would be limited. But in this case, the ECJ held that Mr King should be entitled to claim backdated holiday pay not just for the previous holiday year, but stretching right back to when he started working for the company. This meant that the liability added up to a very considerable sum. The case will now be sent back to the UK Court of Appeal, but it is likely that it will follow this decision from the ECJ. Companies that use a lot of self-employed contractors need to be aware that this status is being subject to scrutiny more and more often. The potential bill for making the wrong decision on worker status is set to become a lot more expensive.
Posted in Shorter Reads
Comments Off on Worker entitled to backdated holiday pay