Monthly Archives: May 2019

Medical patent infringement

We acted for a pioneering Swiss-based medical laboratory, in High Court patent infringement and validity proceedings. This complex case considered the infringement of a patent for an innovative medical product under the newly developed doctrine of equivalents as recently formulated …

Posted in Case Study | Comments Off on Medical patent infringement

Dispute with commercial tenant

We successfully acted for a commercial landlord whose tenant was in breach of its lease on numerous counts, including using the property in breach of the user clause and causing a nuisance and annoyance.

Posted in Case Study | Comments Off on Dispute with commercial tenant

Regulatory body’s new HQ

We advised a major UK Government regulatory body on the £ multi-million construction contract and all construction issues in relation to its new central London headquarters.

Posted in Case Study | Comments Off on Regulatory body’s new HQ

Funding of a hotel

We are acting for a major Far-Eastern bank in relation to the funding of the acquisition of a site for a 600 bed hotel and its subsequent development. The market value of the completed development will exceed £100 million.

Posted in Case Study | Comments Off on Funding of a hotel

Overseas Bank’s European HQ

We are acting for an overseas bank on the relocation of its European HQ in central London. This ongoing project is due to last for several years and includes the negotiation of documents in respect of the new premises, re-gearing …

Posted in Case Study | Comments Off on Overseas Bank’s European HQ

Sovereign wealth funds property portfolio

We act for a sovereign wealth fund in relation to its portfolio of property in central London, including advice on property management, real estate litigation, corporate tax and international law matters.

Posted in Case Study | Comments Off on Sovereign wealth funds property portfolio

Commercial agreements in the Arts & Culture Sector

We work with a number of renowned artists, purchasers of art, art galleries and art institutions drafting, reviewing and revising a wide range of documentation and agreements. These include artists and art dealer consignment agreements, bills of sale, art gallery …

Posted in Case Study | Comments Off on Commercial agreements in the Arts & Culture Sector

He-Man Dual Controls purchase

We acted for a company backed by private equity (including Jon Moulton) in its purchase of He-Man Dual Controls – a leading manufacturer of dual-control systems for cars. In addition to the acquisition we also advised on the equity financing …

Posted in Case Study | Comments Off on He-Man Dual Controls purchase

New York Attorney General launches an investigation into cryptocurrency trading platform

The New York Attorney General’s investigation has determined that the Bitfinex trading platform and the virtual currency, ‘tether’, have covered up the apparent loss of $850 million in co-mingled client and corporate funds. The Attorney General, Letitia James, said: “New York state has led the way in requiring virtual currency businesses to operate according to the law.  And we will continue to stand-up for investors and seek justice on their behalf when misled or cheated by any of these companies.” A court order obtained by the office of the Attorney General requires the companies to immediately cease further dissipation of USD assets which back tether tokens. Tether had repeatedly told its investors that the virtual currency was backed 1-to1 by USD held in cash reserves. Court papers filed by the Attorney General’s office alleged that Bitfinex has taken at least $700 million from Tether’s reserves to hide its undisclosed losses. Whilst it seems that the cash reserves did exist, the Attorney General’s comments suggest that the reserves could be used for other purposes without investors knowing. The companies’ General Counsel has said in an affidavit that Tether has on hand $2.1 billion in cash and cash equivalents representing approximately 74% of the current outstanding tethers. Bitfinex and Tether dispute that the court has jurisdiction over the companies because they do not operate in the US and because they ban New York residents from operating on their platforms. The companies sought to modify the injunction, to prevent disruption to its business, at a hearing on Monday but the judge ordered the injunction to remain in effect. The parties have been given a week to try and agree the scope of the injunction for the judge to rule on.

Posted in Shorter Reads | Comments Off on New York Attorney General launches an investigation into cryptocurrency trading platform

Advising a leading cultural institute

Posted in Case Study | Comments Off on Advising a leading cultural institute