-
Archives
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- January 2017
- December 2014
- September 2014
- June 2014
-
Meta
Monthly Archives: April 2019
First Tower Trustee Ltd v CDS
The Court swept aside a significant body of cases which permitted banks to rely on contractual clauses to avoid liability for misrepresentation, and instead held that such clauses must first pass the test of reasonableness set out in s.3 of …
Posted in Longer Reads
Comments Off on First Tower Trustee Ltd v CDS
CLO Manager not entitled to Incentive Fee on optional redemption
The claim was brought by Deutsche Trustee Company Limited (the “Trustee”) in order to determine the correct interpretation of the bond documentation in which Barings (UK) Limited (the “Collateral Manager”) claimed to be entitled to over €15 million in the …
Posted in Longer Reads
Tagged Collateral Manager, Deutsche Trustee Company, High Court, Napier Park
Comments Off on CLO Manager not entitled to Incentive Fee on optional redemption
Collyer Bristow recognised as one of the UK’s Top Law Firms by eprivateclient
Collyer Bristow has been named as one of the eprivateclient Top Law Firms for 2019, in Tier II. The Top Law Firms guide is an initiative by eprivateclient to identify, recognise and promote the top private client law firms in …
Posted in News
Tagged eprivateclient, private client, top law firms
Comments Off on Collyer Bristow recognised as one of the UK’s Top Law Firms by eprivateclient
Being born a royal is hard enough – try being a US taxpayer too
Harry, Meghan and their child will find themselves in a position familiar to any US taxpayers living outside the US. The potential liability to both US and UK tax is one which can become complicated quickly, however there are solutions that can help clients avoid taxation in both jurisdictions (even if it still leaves them with a headache!).The UK and the USA have entered into a number of double tax treaties, under which the two jurisdictions agree which authority has the primary taxing rights in various circumstances. It is worth remember though that the US and UK tax years do not cover the same period (US tax years ending 31 December and UK tax years ending 5 April) and so clients need to ensure that any planning is carried out at the appropriate point to ensure that the requisite criteria are achieved.A further headache is over who each jurisdiction considers the ‘taxpayer’. In certain circumstances this might not be the same person or entity and, consequently, one jurisdiction might not offer a credit for tax paid in the other jurisdiction. It might also be that one jurisdiction offers a relief or exemption which is not matched in the other jurisdiction, thus leaving the taxpayer with an unexpected liability. For example, UK taxpayers can usually claim 100% relief from capital gains tax on the sale of their main residence. However, the corresponding US allowance is only on the first $250,000 of gain. it may be therefore that a UK resident, US citizen will find themselves with a US tax charge on the sale of a UK property which is standing at a significant gain, even though the UK itself doesn’t charge.It is possible for a US citizen to ‘expatriate’ (i.e. give up their citizenship) and thus extricate themselves from the US tax regime. However, in order to expatriate without being liable for a punitive exit tax charge or suffering under the yoke of being a ‘covered expatriate’ (which comes with significant tax disadvantages), clients must ensure they do not meet any one of several criteria.Fortunately, for children born to UK/US parents there are several avenues which may allow the child to give up their US citizenship without reference to most of these criteria.The new royal baby will be born into a complicated, unusual and, at times, baffling system. And that’s just the Royal Family.
Posted in Shorter Reads
Comments Off on Being born a royal is hard enough – try being a US taxpayer too
Air crash investigator report into Ethiopian Airlines crash – financial implications for Boeing?
Ethiopian investigators released a statement this morning providing details of their preliminary findings into the crash of the Ethiopian Airlines flight ET302, which crashed shortly after take-off from Addis Ababa. The accident involved Boeing’s new B737 Max 8 aircraft type, …
Posted in Shorter Reads
Comments Off on Air crash investigator report into Ethiopian Airlines crash – financial implications for Boeing?
























