Longer Reads

Time to review contractual non-compete clauses

Our Employment team share their thoughts on the government’s proposal to limit non-compete clauses in employment contracts to three months.

1 minute read

Published 22 May 2023

Authors

Share

Key information

In its policy paper Smarter Regulation to Grow the Economy published on 10 May, the government is proposing to limit non-compete clauses in employment contracts to three months.

A non-compete clause is one type of a “restrictive covenant” that an employer may wish to include in a contract of employment to restrict an employee or worker’s activities post-termination of their employment. Generally speaking, a contractual term which seeks to restrict an employee’s activities after termination is void for being in restraint of trade and contrary to public policy. Such clauses in employment contracts are also usually viewed more strictly than those in commercial contracts due to the unequal bargaining position between employer and employee, and so are less likely to be regarded as reasonable and enforceable.

In order for such a clause to be enforceable, the employer needs to show that it has a legitimate business interest to protect, and that the protection sought is reasonable having regard to the interests of the parties and the public interest. Examples of legitimate business interests typically include the employee’s trade connections (with customers, clients or suppliers) and goodwill, confidential information and trade secrets, and maintaining the stability of the workforce. The restrictions in such a clause must also be no wider than is necessary, so the employer should consider carefully both the geographical area and time limit of the non-compete restrictions.

That being said, there is currently no statutory time limit on the duration of non-compete clauses in employment contracts. Non-compete restrictions of between three and twelve months are not uncommon depending on the seniority, experience and importance of the employee or worker. Anything over twelve months is unlikely to be enforceable.

The policy paper makes clear that the government intends to cap the time limit on non-compete restrictions to three months. The hope is that this will give up to five million UK workers  greater flexibility in joining competitors or starting up rival businesses. It is also anticipated that this change will be beneficial to the wider UK economy by widening the talent pool, and improving the quality of candidates that employers can hire to grow their businesses.

At this stage it is unclear whether the proposals will apply to non-compete clauses in existing employment contracts that are longer than the proposed three month cap, and whether the proposed legislation will apply to other types of contracts that typically contain non-compete clauses. Interestingly, the policy paper states that there are no proposed changes to wider non-solicitation clauses in employment contracts.

These proposed changes will require primary legislation to go through parliament but we recommend that employers should start to revisit contractual restraint of trade clauses now and be prepared for what comes next.

For more information, please visit our Employment Lawyers page.

Related latest updates
PREV NEXT

Related content

Arrow Back to Insights

Longer Reads

Time to review contractual non-compete clauses

Our Employment team share their thoughts on the government’s proposal to limit non-compete clauses in employment contracts to three months.

Published 22 May 2023

Associated sectors / services

  • Employment law for employers

Authors

In its policy paper Smarter Regulation to Grow the Economy published on 10 May, the government is proposing to limit non-compete clauses in employment contracts to three months.

A non-compete clause is one type of a “restrictive covenant” that an employer may wish to include in a contract of employment to restrict an employee or worker’s activities post-termination of their employment. Generally speaking, a contractual term which seeks to restrict an employee’s activities after termination is void for being in restraint of trade and contrary to public policy. Such clauses in employment contracts are also usually viewed more strictly than those in commercial contracts due to the unequal bargaining position between employer and employee, and so are less likely to be regarded as reasonable and enforceable.

In order for such a clause to be enforceable, the employer needs to show that it has a legitimate business interest to protect, and that the protection sought is reasonable having regard to the interests of the parties and the public interest. Examples of legitimate business interests typically include the employee’s trade connections (with customers, clients or suppliers) and goodwill, confidential information and trade secrets, and maintaining the stability of the workforce. The restrictions in such a clause must also be no wider than is necessary, so the employer should consider carefully both the geographical area and time limit of the non-compete restrictions.

That being said, there is currently no statutory time limit on the duration of non-compete clauses in employment contracts. Non-compete restrictions of between three and twelve months are not uncommon depending on the seniority, experience and importance of the employee or worker. Anything over twelve months is unlikely to be enforceable.

The policy paper makes clear that the government intends to cap the time limit on non-compete restrictions to three months. The hope is that this will give up to five million UK workers  greater flexibility in joining competitors or starting up rival businesses. It is also anticipated that this change will be beneficial to the wider UK economy by widening the talent pool, and improving the quality of candidates that employers can hire to grow their businesses.

At this stage it is unclear whether the proposals will apply to non-compete clauses in existing employment contracts that are longer than the proposed three month cap, and whether the proposed legislation will apply to other types of contracts that typically contain non-compete clauses. Interestingly, the policy paper states that there are no proposed changes to wider non-solicitation clauses in employment contracts.

These proposed changes will require primary legislation to go through parliament but we recommend that employers should start to revisit contractual restraint of trade clauses now and be prepared for what comes next.

For more information, please visit our Employment Lawyers page.

Associated sectors / services

  • Employment law for employers

Authors

Need some more information? Make an enquiry below.

    Subscribe

    Please add your details and your areas of interest below

    Specialist sectors:

    Legal services:

    Other information:

    Jurisdictions of interest to you (other than UK):



    Article contributors

    Enjoy reading our articles? why not subscribe to notifications so you’ll never miss one?

    Subscribe to our articles

    Message us on WhatsApp (calling not available)

    Please note that Collyer Bristow provides this service during office hours for general information and enquiries only and that no legal or other professional advice will be provided over the WhatsApp platform. Please also note that if you choose to use this platform your personal data is likely to be processed outside the UK and EEA, including in the US. Appropriate legal or other professional opinion should be taken before taking or omitting to take any action in respect of any specific problem. Collyer Bristow LLP accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may arise from reliance on information provided. All information will be deleted immediately upon completion of a conversation.

    I accept Close

    Close
    Scroll up

    Find out about Business

    Find out about Dispute Resolution

    Find out about Individuals & Families

    Find out about Real Estate

    We are Collyer Bristow - The law firm for those that
    value individuality, creativity and collaboration.

    Legal & Pricing info Regulatory InformationAccessibilitySitemapPricing and service information

    Listen to our latest podcast: Charity Rules Uncovered: US vs. UK (Part 2)

    Read our latest article: Gaming or gambling? The regulation of video game ‘loot boxes’

    Listen to our latest podcast: Charity Rules Uncovered: US vs. UK (Part 1)

    Read our latest article: Preventing sexual harassment: The ghost of Christmas party?

    Listen to our latest podcast: Budget Miniseries: Impacts on Families with US Connections (Part 3)

    ExpandNeed some help?Toggle

    < Back to menu

    I have an issue and need your help

    Scroll to see our A-Z list of expertise

    Get in touch

    Get in touch using our form below.



      Business Close
      Private Wealth Close
      Hot Topics Close