- Employment law for employees
- Employment law for employers
Shorter Reads
The Labour Party has officially been elected as the new government of the United Kingdom meaning it will likely now be hurrying to initiate its proposed (and radically transformative) legislation, as outlined in its Manifesto and Labour’s Plan to Make Work Pay: Delivering A New Deal for Working People (the “Plan”), within the next 100 days of office (or by 12 October 2024).
Employers should now start considering how these proposals may affect their business to ensure they are ready for the reformed employment and business landscape that is inevitably on the (near) horizon.
4 minute read
Published 5 July 2024
The Labour Party has officially been elected as the new government of the United Kingdom meaning it will likely now be hurrying to initiate its proposed (and radically transformative) legislation, as outlined in its Manifesto and Labour’s Plan to Make Work Pay: Delivering A New Deal for Working People (the “Plan”), within the next 100 days of office (or by 12 October 2024).
Employers can however breathe a (small) sigh of relief as putting these proposals into law will take time and despite the initial 100-day promise, Labour has committed to “consult fully with business” before legislation is passed so the raft of changes will likely take longer (in most cases) to come into force. This being said, employers should now start considering how these proposals may affect their business to ensure they are ready for the reformed employment and business landscape that is inevitably on the (near) horizon.
To help employers better understand what is to come, we have summarised some of the key proposals including the impact we anticipate that these will have on UK employment law (and as result, your business) in the coming months (and years) and will continue to provide more comprehensive analysis as Labour provide more information going forward.
The Plan – the key points for employers
Labour is looking to overhaul the UK’s current three-tier employment status system that currently differentiates between employee, worker and the genuinely self-employed (which has separate employment rights and taxation systems) to a simpler two-tier system with individuals either being classified as “workers” or “self-employed”. This is inevitably due to a rise in the gig economy that has meant the current complex legal framework is difficult to apply to new (and often innovative) ways of working resulting in significant challenges for both employers and vulnerable workers.
Individuals in the “worker” category will obtain the full set of employment rights that are currently reserved for employees only as well as any new rights passed into legislation. This would mean they would benefit from rights to maternity, paternity and other family-related leave and unfair dismissal rights (see also point 2 below). Businesses who engage “workers” should start auditing this workforce and begin to consider the potential cost implications of the extended provision of rights.
Another significant change is the proposal to remove the two-year qualifying period before an employee obtains unfair dismissal protection which would therefore make unfair dismissal a “day one” right. This will likely have a substantial effect on recruitment practices, use and management of probationary periods and training for managers. Employers would need a justifiable reason for dismissal and to follow a fair process (including lengthy performance improvement plans) from the outset of an individual’s employment. It is also open whether it will be easier to dismiss someone in their probationary period or whether the full rules on dismissal will apply to them as well. If so, employers may be encouraged to use them routinely, and perhaps, for longer periods of time than is currently the case. If so, this could mean that we see a cap in length of probationary periods coming into force to prevent them being used excessively and unreasonably.
Given the existing legislation has scope for the government to make these changes without consultation or parliamentary approval, this change is one that could be pushed through quickly meaning there could be a rapid uptick in grievances and Tribunal claims that will require more management time and money to deal with. In practice, we think that claimants with automatic unfair dismissal and discriminatory dismissal claims (especially if higher paid) will continue to bring those claims as they are able to do as these are “day one” rights anyway, but instead pleading ordinary unfair dismissal as an alternative or additional claim to add another string to their bow. Going forward, employers will inevitably become more cautious when it comes to recruitment to limit the risk of a bad hire.
Currently, claimants have (for most claims) three months in which to issue an employment claim against their current or former employer. Labour’s ambition is to increase the time limit to six months and their view is that it will allow more time for internal procedures to be carried out (along with settlement discussions), therefore (hopefully) decreasing the number of Employment Tribunal claims. This could be the case as employees will not be forced to act as quickly to protect their position; but it does mean that there will be a significantly longer period of time before employers are out of the woods in terms of whether an employee has brought a claim or not.
Conclusion and key takeaways
As mentioned above, whilst it is not immediately clear when (or if) some of these changes will be implemented and what they will look like when/if they are, we suggest starting to consider how these changes will affect your business by:
Related content
Shorter Reads
The Labour Party has officially been elected as the new government of the United Kingdom meaning it will likely now be hurrying to initiate its proposed (and radically transformative) legislation, as outlined in its Manifesto and Labour’s Plan to Make Work Pay: Delivering A New Deal for Working People (the “Plan”), within the next 100 days of office (or by 12 October 2024).
Employers should now start considering how these proposals may affect their business to ensure they are ready for the reformed employment and business landscape that is inevitably on the (near) horizon.
Published 5 July 2024
The Labour Party has officially been elected as the new government of the United Kingdom meaning it will likely now be hurrying to initiate its proposed (and radically transformative) legislation, as outlined in its Manifesto and Labour’s Plan to Make Work Pay: Delivering A New Deal for Working People (the “Plan”), within the next 100 days of office (or by 12 October 2024).
Employers can however breathe a (small) sigh of relief as putting these proposals into law will take time and despite the initial 100-day promise, Labour has committed to “consult fully with business” before legislation is passed so the raft of changes will likely take longer (in most cases) to come into force. This being said, employers should now start considering how these proposals may affect their business to ensure they are ready for the reformed employment and business landscape that is inevitably on the (near) horizon.
To help employers better understand what is to come, we have summarised some of the key proposals including the impact we anticipate that these will have on UK employment law (and as result, your business) in the coming months (and years) and will continue to provide more comprehensive analysis as Labour provide more information going forward.
The Plan – the key points for employers
Labour is looking to overhaul the UK’s current three-tier employment status system that currently differentiates between employee, worker and the genuinely self-employed (which has separate employment rights and taxation systems) to a simpler two-tier system with individuals either being classified as “workers” or “self-employed”. This is inevitably due to a rise in the gig economy that has meant the current complex legal framework is difficult to apply to new (and often innovative) ways of working resulting in significant challenges for both employers and vulnerable workers.
Individuals in the “worker” category will obtain the full set of employment rights that are currently reserved for employees only as well as any new rights passed into legislation. This would mean they would benefit from rights to maternity, paternity and other family-related leave and unfair dismissal rights (see also point 2 below). Businesses who engage “workers” should start auditing this workforce and begin to consider the potential cost implications of the extended provision of rights.
Another significant change is the proposal to remove the two-year qualifying period before an employee obtains unfair dismissal protection which would therefore make unfair dismissal a “day one” right. This will likely have a substantial effect on recruitment practices, use and management of probationary periods and training for managers. Employers would need a justifiable reason for dismissal and to follow a fair process (including lengthy performance improvement plans) from the outset of an individual’s employment. It is also open whether it will be easier to dismiss someone in their probationary period or whether the full rules on dismissal will apply to them as well. If so, employers may be encouraged to use them routinely, and perhaps, for longer periods of time than is currently the case. If so, this could mean that we see a cap in length of probationary periods coming into force to prevent them being used excessively and unreasonably.
Given the existing legislation has scope for the government to make these changes without consultation or parliamentary approval, this change is one that could be pushed through quickly meaning there could be a rapid uptick in grievances and Tribunal claims that will require more management time and money to deal with. In practice, we think that claimants with automatic unfair dismissal and discriminatory dismissal claims (especially if higher paid) will continue to bring those claims as they are able to do as these are “day one” rights anyway, but instead pleading ordinary unfair dismissal as an alternative or additional claim to add another string to their bow. Going forward, employers will inevitably become more cautious when it comes to recruitment to limit the risk of a bad hire.
Currently, claimants have (for most claims) three months in which to issue an employment claim against their current or former employer. Labour’s ambition is to increase the time limit to six months and their view is that it will allow more time for internal procedures to be carried out (along with settlement discussions), therefore (hopefully) decreasing the number of Employment Tribunal claims. This could be the case as employees will not be forced to act as quickly to protect their position; but it does mean that there will be a significantly longer period of time before employers are out of the woods in terms of whether an employee has brought a claim or not.
Conclusion and key takeaways
As mentioned above, whilst it is not immediately clear when (or if) some of these changes will be implemented and what they will look like when/if they are, we suggest starting to consider how these changes will affect your business by:
Need some more information? Make an enquiry below.
Subscribe
Please add your details and your areas of interest below
Article contributors
Associate
Specialising in Employment law for employees and Employment law for employers
Partner - Head of Employment
Specialising in Employment law for employees and Employment law for employers
Enjoy reading our articles? why not subscribe to notifications so you’ll never miss one?
Subscribe to our articlesPlease note that Collyer Bristow provides this service during office hours for general information and enquiries only and that no legal or other professional advice will be provided over the WhatsApp platform. Please also note that if you choose to use this platform your personal data is likely to be processed outside the UK and EEA, including in the US. Appropriate legal or other professional opinion should be taken before taking or omitting to take any action in respect of any specific problem. Collyer Bristow LLP accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may arise from reliance on information provided. All information will be deleted immediately upon completion of a conversation.
Close